The American Farm Bureau sees much it likes in the House farm bill proposal but less in the Senate’s as the partisan battle lines deepen in the lead-up to Thursday’s House Ag panel markup.
The farm bill fight has reached a boiling point even before the House markup, with Ag Democrats mounting a full-court press against Chair GT Thompson’s GOP proposal, unleashing an exhaustive roster of hunger, conservation, and labor groups who are opposed to it.
But the American Farm Bureau, National Cattlemen, and even the National Farmers Union see much they like.
“Where Chairman Thompson is coming down is he’s doing an across-the-board reference price increase that is 10 to 20 percent over what is currently the statutory reference price,” says Joe Gilson, director of government affairs with Farm Bureau. “And Farm Bureau believes that the 10 to 20 percent increase is meeting the moment.”
Senate Ag Chair Stabenow’s plan at five percent more heavily favors southern crops. Stabenow would lower the AGI income cap to $700,000 for farmers to receive farm payments.
“They might have a gross income that’s over $700,000, but net income where they don’t make any money that year because of the increased expenses that they faced on the farm,” Gilson says. “And so, just the reality of farming in today’s inflationary environment, that’s not going to work for a lot of farms and ranches.”
And, on CRP, Gilson says Farm Bureau is concerned because Stabenow’s proposal increases the number of acres and increases the payment rate.
That CRP will compete with beginning farmers and ranchers. House Chair Thompson hopes if he can get some bipartisan support in committee and advance a bill in the House, it will put pressure on Senate Democrats to move. But it’s a tall order in an election year and the need for another extension by September 30th.
